Tuesday, February 28, 2006

Factor the drawing board


X-Factor 1 - 3

To my surprise, I find I've been reading X-Factor.

Those who bought comics in the 1990s remember them as a long, shrill, anguished wail punctuated with staccato bursts of hysterical sobbing. At the beginning of the decade there was a huge boom in interest and comics prices, and there was an accompanying change in how Marvel viewed its product. Noticing that most comics readers were also comics collectors, it started putting out product solely with collection in mind. Crossovers! Events! Limited Edition Balsa Wood and Salami covers! You couldn't dam up the flood of this stuff.

Back then, as now, Marvel's premier product was the X-Men. It started as one comic, then New Mutants joined it. Then there was Wolverine. Excalibur. X-Force. X-Men. Generation X. X-Files (or was that something else? I think I need a fact checker). Marvel took the corporate decision to push out as much product as it could, without regard either to quality or its own long-term prospects.

Now we could argue about what the nadir of all this was - was it the splitting of the X-Men into their wretched gold and blue teams? The turgid Excalibur? The irritating, slurring, vapid Gambit? Or how about big-gunned, lumpen-headed Cable with his rough, tough, gruff, bluff attitude? Oh, it would be tempting to put Cable at the bottom of the bonfire.

Except that, for me, nothing summed up the futility of the times more than X-Factor. An initially poor concept (the original X-Men brought back together as pretend mutant hunters who are secretly helping their victims) degenerated into no concept at all. Staffed wholly by Z-List mutants desired by none of the main X-Men writers, it could have filled a niche, but no-one invented one. It just carried on, purposeless and flaccid, scripted (in the main) by people who would rather be elsewhere.

So why did I buy the damn thing? Because it took me a few years to realise I was being had. Because I was a collector as well as a reader. Because I loved all things mutant. Because I was an idiot.

Slowly but collectively, though, we did realise how bad comics had become, and we stopped buying. Comic sales collapsed, a lot of sharp marketing professionals lost their jobs, and Marvel eventually came round to realising that you can only piss in the well so many times before it becomes undrinkable. We like to whinge, but the quality of comics is now higher than it's ever been.

Now there are certain nineties revivals that you figure are never going to happen, like a Shed Seven comeback tour or putting John Major back in Downing Street, not because it's impossible to achieve, but because you can't see why anyone would want to bother. X-Factor is surely one of those. Normally, I would expect to skip past Marvel's new X-Factor without the vaguest desire even to browse it.

Except, and it's a big except, the new X-Factor is written by Peter David. David is in the position of being one of comics' best writers, but being perenially ignored by those in the editors chairs. His Captain Marvel was a work of pure genius, funny and sad and tragic and challenging and all those things you want from a comic book but rarely get. Obviously, it sold like a dog, but quality often doesn't sell. As far as I know, Peter David doesn't get work off DC at all. Last year Joe Quesada pointedly missed David off his list of Marvel's top writers. I don't understand why. Perhaps David has tourettes or bad breath or keeps called Quesada "fat boy"?

Anyway, I'll follow Peter David anywhere, even back to his revived X-Factor (he was one of the writers on the orignal series, though, typically, I managed to miss this, instead hunkering down for the Mackie years).

It's even got a concept this time - X-Factor is an investigations agency. If I find myself cringing at the absurd Strong Guy or that ridiculous Werewolf with the Brigadoon accent, there is still the magnificently stroppy Monet and the schizophrenic Jamie Maddox to enjoy. And behind it all, Peter David carries off his story with a firm touch, and drops in just enough foreshadowing to make me want to come back for more. It's too early to say if it's good, but it's definitely not bad.

I like X-Factor. Now there are words I thought I'd never write.

7 Comments:

Anonymous Richard said...

Actually, David was the writer on the X-FACTOR revival, replete with z-listers (Havok, Polaris, Madrox, Guido, Rayne, Quicksilver, and maybe someone else), that coincided with the rise of X-FORCE and the X-MEN red/blue split. His initial run on X-FACTOR was the one of the few constant pleasures I can recall from the ages of 11 to 13.

7:05 pm  
Blogger Disintegrating Clone said...

As I said, I managed to miss David's run on the original X-Factor, while managing to buy most of the dross either side of it. It takes talent to choose purchases this badly.

7:07 pm  
Anonymous Chuck T. said...

I really, really liked David's run on X-Factor; but I'll defend to the death the separate runs of Alan Davis and Warren Ellis on Excalibur. Aside from these three short, sweet rides; Marvel rubbed everyone's face in X for ten years.

9:36 pm  
Blogger David Golding said...

If you can, check out X-Factor #87, the jewel in the crown of Peter David's first run. This is where he demonstrates why the z-list team are so worthwhile. People still imitate this issue - poorly.

11:17 pm  
Anonymous SpiritGlyph said...

Fortunately, some of PAD's X-Factor has been collected into a handy trade. X-Factor was mostly terrible, but this original comic run remains one of the most runs I've ever met.

http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0785118721/qid=1141196630/sr=1-1/ref=sr_1_1/102-9784766-0863350?s=books&v=glance&n=283155

</plug>

Everything other thing named X-Factor was pretty much crap. I'm sorry you missed the good bit.

Oh, and as long as I'm recommending stuff, check out PAD's Madrox miniseries. The current X-Factor follows that far more than the first volume, both in plot and tone.

7:16 am  
Blogger Disintegrating Clone said...

I'm personally not too bothered about the Alan Davis Excalibur, but I'll agree about Warren Ellis (I think I did a post about it last year). Ellis' work on Counter-X highlighted just how bad all the other stuff was back then, and probably helped move things along. And, obviously, I wouldn't be surprised if David's X-Factor was great. Pretty much everything he writes is.

But I still think Excalibur was bad, and X-Factor worse. Partly because mostly they weren't well-written, and partly because they had no theme. Excalibur was some X-Men who liked hanging around on islands in the North Atlantic. X-Factor had no concept at all, as far as I could see. To me, Excalibur and X-Factor were just attempts to mine the same X-Men seam. Great writers could make great individual issues, but the moment they left, both series instantly collapsed into dross.

Can a good writer redeem a bad idea? Sounds like a good idea for a post.

2:15 pm  
Blogger dfadf said...

Microsoft Office
Office 2010
Microsoft Office 2010
Office 2010 key
Office 2010 download
Office 2010 Professional
Microsoft outlook
Outlook 2010
Windows 7
Microsoft outlook 2010

3:34 am  

Post a Comment

<< Home